First Phase I Study Proves Safety, Immune Response of Ebola DNA Vaccine - Pharmaceutical Technology

ADVERTISEMENT



almanac button
First Phase I Study Proves Safety, Immune Response of Ebola DNA Vaccine


ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology

First Phase I Study Proves Safety, Immune Response of Ebola DNA Vaccine

A Phase I trial conducted on an Ebola vaccine candidate developed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and administered using proprietary DNA delivery technology from Vical Inc. (San Diego, CA, www.vical.com) has shown the vaccine to be safe, well tolerated, and capable of producing both antibody and T-cell Ebola-specific responses in humans.

The DNA vaccine incorporates genetic material encoding core and surface proteins from two strains of Ebola. The vaccine used in the Phase I trial included three bacterial plasmids (pDNAs), one each encoding the surface glycoprotein (GP) from the Zaire strain of Ebola, GP from the Sudan/Gulu strain, and the internal nucleoprotein (NP) from the Zaire strain.

According to Vical, plasmids can be manufactured using "uniform methods" of fermentation and processing. The company secured a nonexclusive license from the National Institute of Health (NIH) to proprietary gene sequences used in the vaccine.

Conducted at the NIH Clinical Center, the Phase I study was the first human trial for any Ebola vaccine. "The high rates of immune responses at all dose levels in this initial human Ebola vaccine study support continued development of this vaccine and further evaluation of our technology for potential additional biodefense and emerging disease applications," said David C. Kaslow, MD, Vical's Chief Scientific Officer, in a company statement. "Our processes allow rapid development and manufacturing of vaccines without handling potentially dangerous pathogens."

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

PharmTech Poll
ICH representatives met in Brussels in mid-November. What's your take on global harmonization efforts?
Much more work is needed from the ICH regulatory members (FDA, EU, MHLW)
Regulatory harmonization is coming along at a good pace
Harmonization is not necessary
Much more work is needed from the ICH regulatory members (FDA, EU, MHLW)
67%
Regulatory harmonization is coming along at a good pace
33%
Harmonization is not necessary
0%
View Results
Author Guidelines
Editorial Staff Contacts

Google Scholar



Advertiser Gallery
Source: ePT--the Electronic Newsletter of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Click here